SHIVSHAKTI WOMEN SELF HELP - KIRNA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1667/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010138162026

Filing Number

WPC/7989/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/1667/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO FAIR PRICE SHOP ( 1759 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVSHAKTI WOMEN SELF HELP - KIRNA

    Adv. A.N.PANDEY,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA, ,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector (Food Department)

  3. 3.The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)

  4. 4.The Food Inspector

  5. 5.President of Purnima Women Self Help Group

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's (Shivshakti Women Self Help - Kirna) interim relief application seeking to stay the suspension of their fair price shop allotment order dated 17.03.2026. The court found the petitioner's explanation unsatisfactory and rejected the prayer for interim protection. The case has been adjourned by two weeks for the respondents to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's (Shivshakti Women Self Help - Kirna) interim relief application seeking to stay the suspension of their fair price shop allotment order dated 17.03.2026. The court found the petitioner's explanation unsatisfactory and rejected the prayer for interim protection. The case has been adjourned by two weeks for the respondents to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case