SONU PANDO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — MCRC/3299/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138142026

Filing Number

MCRC/5827/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3299/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU PANDO

    Adv. SIDDHANT TIWARI,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL, ,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Sonu Pando's bail application in a case involving serious charges including murder, rioting, and criminal intimidation stemming from a violent incident on 28.02.2024 that resulted in two deaths. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant was part of an unlawful assembly and participated in the alleged incident, and considering the gravity and nature of the offences, deemed it inappropriate to grant regular bail despite the applicant's prolonged detention since March 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Sonu Pando's bail application in a case involving serious charges including murder, rioting, and criminal intimidation stemming from a violent incident on 28.02.2024 that resulted in two deaths. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant was part of an unlawful assembly and participated in the alleged incident, and considering the gravity and nature of the offences, deemed it inappropriate to grant regular bail despite the applicant's prolonged detention since March 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case