SANJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1041/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138112026

Filing Number

CRMP/5825/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1041/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR

    Adv. AKHILESH MISHRA,ANJALI NAYAK,ANJALI NAYAK, ,BHAGAT RAM IJARDAR

  2. 2.Shailesh Parmar

  3. 3.Pradipta Kumar Tripathi

  4. 4.Amarjeet Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Superintendent of Police Raipur

  3. 3.Station House Officer

  4. 4.H. R. Grandsons and Company

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Canara Bank employees seeking to quash a charge sheet for fundamental defects. The petitioners' counsel conceded that the petition was improperly drafted, lacked essential particulars including specific offence details and complete FIR information, and failed to meet legal requirements for quashment petitions. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh, properly constituted petition, subject to depositing ₹4,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1041/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Canara Bank employees seeking to quash a charge sheet for fundamental defects. The petitioners' counsel conceded that the petition was improperly drafted, lacked essential particulars including specific offence details and complete FIR information, and failed to meet legal requirements for quashment petitions. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh, properly constituted petition, subject to depositing ₹4,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case