RAJESH KUMAR KHAIRWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/559/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138042026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5819/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/559/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR KHAIRWAR

    Adv. p.chetan kumar,kiran singh,kiran singh, ,Jyoti Singh,Pramod Ramteke,P. RAVINDER BABU,KRISHNA TANDON,kiran singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajesh Kumar Khairwar in a case involving allegations of sexual intercourse under the pretext of marriage. The Court found that since the victim was a major and the relationship was consensual, and the FIR was lodged years after the alleged incidents only because the applicant refused to marry, bail was warranted. The applicant was released on personal bond with surety and strict conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/559/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajesh Kumar Khairwar in a case involving allegations of sexual intercourse under the pretext of marriage. The Court found that since the victim was a major and the relationship was consensual, and the FIR was lodged years after the alleged incidents only because the applicant refused to marry, bail was warranted. The applicant was released on personal bond with surety and strict conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case