ABHISHEK JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3429/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010137742026

Filing Number

MCRC/5805/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3429/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK JAISWAL

    Adv. Aman tamboli

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary of MCRC No. 3429/2026 (Abhishek Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh) The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Abhishek Jaiswal and four co-accused in connection with Crime No. 389/2025, involving charges of document forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicants' names emerged solely from forgery allegations and, having remained in custody since January-March 2026 with trial expected to be lengthy, they were entitled to bail subject to conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRC No. 3429/2026 (Abhishek Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh) The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Abhishek Jaiswal and four co-accused in connection with Crime No. 389/2025, involving charges of document forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicants' names emerged solely from forgery allegations and, having remained in custody since January-March 2026 with trial expected to be lengthy, they were entitled to bail subject to conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case