RAHUL KUMAR MISHRA vs AAVAS FINANCIERS LTD EARLIER KNOWN AS A.U. HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, Advocate - AYUSH VERMA, ,VIVEK SHARMA,Shantam Awasthi,Umesh verma — WA/396/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010137702026

Filing Number

WA/7967/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WA/396/2026

Registration Date

25-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR MISHRA

    Adv. RAMAN MISHRA

  2. 2.Tribhuvan Prasad Mishra

  3. 3.Smt. Vandana Mishra

  4. 4.Sunil Kol

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AAVAS FINANCIERS LTD EARLIER KNOWN AS A.U. HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, Advocate - AYUSH VERMA, ,VIVEK SHARMA,Shantam Awasthi,Umesh verma

  2. 2.The Tahsildar, Raipur

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Naib Tahsildar Raipur

  4. 4.District Magistrate cum Collector Raipur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appellants' writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order directing execution of a SARFAESI Act Section 14 possession order by the Tahsildar. The court held that revenue authorities perform a ministerial function under Section 14 and must execute such orders without delay absent an interim stay from the competent Debts Recovery Tribunal; mere pendency of appellants' challenge before the Tribunal without an interim stay order cannot restrain execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/396/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appellants' writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order directing execution of a SARFAESI Act Section 14 possession order by the Tahsildar. The court held that revenue authorities perform a ministerial function under Section 14 and must execute such orders without delay absent an interim stay from the competent Debts Recovery Tribunal; mere pendency of appellants' challenge before the Tribunal without an interim stay order cannot restrain execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case