SURENDRA PAL SINGH GAYATRI SAHU, ,UPASANA MEHTA,HRISHABH DEO SHUKLA,SHASHWAT RAI,SANJAY AGRAWAL,KANCHAN KALWANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1040/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010137432026

Filing Number

CRMP/5793/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1040/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA PAL SINGH GAYATRI SAHU, ,UPASANA MEHTA,HRISHABH DEO SHUKLA,SHASHWAT RAI,SANJAY AGRAWAL,KANCHAN KALWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Dev Priya Ekka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash the FIR and charge-sheet filed against him for allegedly manipulating revenue records (forgery, cheating, and conspiracy). The court held that the investigation had collected sufficient prima facie evidence establishing the petitioner's involvement, and disputed factual issues regarding his posting and role should be decided at trial rather than at the quashing stage, as the inherent jurisdiction is exercised sparingly only when allegations disclose no offense or proceedings show mala fide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1040/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash the FIR and charge-sheet filed against him for allegedly manipulating revenue records (forgery, cheating, and conspiracy). The court held that the investigation had collected sufficient prima facie evidence establishing the petitioner's involvement, and disputed factual issues regarding his posting and role should be decided at trial rather than at the quashing stage, as the inherent jurisdiction is exercised sparingly only when allegations disclose no offense or proceedings show mala fide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case