DR. ASHUTOSH MISHRA vs GURU GHASIDAS VISHWAVIDYALAYA — WPC/2026/2022
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010137092022
Filing Number
WPC/7664/2022
Filing Date
19-Apr-2022
Registration No
WPC/2026/2022
Registration Date
25-Apr-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ACADEMIC MATTERS ( 7 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 708 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. ASHUTOSH MISHRA
Adv. ANISH TIWARI,NIRANJANA TIWARI,NIRANJANA TIWARI, ,ATUL KUMAR KESHARWANI,Saket Kesharwani,Shakti Singh Thakur,Shakti Singh Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.GURU GHASIDAS VISHWAVIDYALAYA
-
2.Assistant Registrar
-
3.Sanjay Dwivedi
Adv. NEERAJ CHOUBEY,AVINASH K.MISHRA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2026/2022 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the petition filed by Dr. Ashutosh Mishra against Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya and others for six weeks (06/05/2026). The respondent-University's counsel sought time to file an application adopting the return of private respondent No.3, which was granted. The petitioner is permitted to file a rejoinder, if any, during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
28-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
28-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
28-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2026/2022
Case Summary: WPC 2026/2022 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the petition filed by Dr. Ashutosh Mishra against Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya and others for six weeks (06/05/2026). The respondent-University's counsel sought time to file an application adopting the return of private respondent No.3, which was granted. The petitioner is permitted to file a rejoinder, if any, during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts