RIKHI RAM K. Rohan(LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPCR/204/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010136992026
Filing Number
WPCR/7922/2026
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPCR/204/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RIKHI RAM K. Rohan(LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Under Secretary
-
3.Director General, Prisons and Correctional Services
-
4.Jail Superintendent
-
5.Collector
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WPCR 204/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the rejection order denying premature release to prisoner Rikhi Ram, finding it a non-speaking order devoid of mandatory reasons required under Rule 358(7)(viii) of the Chhattisgarh Prison Rules, 1968. The court also held that authorities misdirected themselves by equating a single case with multiple victims to "guilty of murder in two or more cases," which the statute clearly contemplates as distinct prosecutions. The matter was remanded for fresh reconsideration with reasoned application of relevant statutory parameters within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCR/204/2026
Case Summary: WPCR 204/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the rejection order denying premature release to prisoner Rikhi Ram, finding it a non-speaking order devoid of mandatory reasons required under Rule 358(7)(viii) of the Chhattisgarh Prison Rules, 1968. The court also held that authorities misdirected themselves by equating a single case with multiple victims to "guilty of murder in two or more cases," which the statute clearly contemplates as distinct prosecutions. The matter was remanded for fresh reconsideration with reasoned application of relevant statutory parameters within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts