AYODHYA PRAJAPATI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1029/2026

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010136432026

Filing Number

CRMP/5762/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1029/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYODHYA PRAJAPATI

    Adv. VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA,ASHOK SONI,ASHOK SONI, ,PRAKASH KUMAR MISHRA,ASHOK SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.First Appellate Authority

  4. 4.Station House Officer

  5. 5.Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed CRMP No. 1029 of 2026 filed by Ayodhya Prajapati against the State of Chhattisgarh for non-prosecution on 06.05.2026. The petitioner failed to appear or provide representation despite repeated calls for hearing, leaving the court with no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1029/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed CRMP No. 1029 of 2026 filed by Ayodhya Prajapati against the State of Chhattisgarh for non-prosecution on 06.05.2026. The petitioner failed to appear or provide representation despite repeated calls for hearing, leaving the court with no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case