SAHIL PATLE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre — MCRCA/545/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135992026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5738/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/545/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL PATLE

    Adv. RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT,SHASHIKANT CHAUHAN,SHASHIKANT CHAUHAN, ,DEEPAK KUMAR,DOMAR SINGH NARANG,GOURAV PATEL,SHASHIKANT CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 545/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Sahil Patle's anticipatory bail application. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that serious allegations of forcible sexual intercourse under POCSO Act were sufficiently supported by the prosecutrix's statement and investigation materials, making the offense grave and heinous. The court found the applicant's defense—claiming false implication due to family property disputes—unconvincing and determined it did not negate the severity of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/545/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 545/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Sahil Patle's anticipatory bail application. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that serious allegations of forcible sexual intercourse under POCSO Act were sufficiently supported by the prosecutrix's statement and investigation materials, making the offense grave and heinous. The court found the applicant's defense—claiming false implication due to family property disputes—unconvincing and determined it did not negate the severity of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case