SAKET SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1026/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135972026

Filing Number

CRMP/5737/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1026/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAKET SHARMA

    Adv. Anmol Sharma,Juhi Pandey,Juhi Pandey, ,Juhi Pandey

  2. 2.SMT. UTTARA DEVI SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.SMT. ANCHAL SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed both cross-FIRs (Crime Nos. 53/2026 and 54/2026) registered between estranged spouses, finding that the allegations were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific attribution of roles to the accused. The court held that the criminal proceedings arose from matrimonial discord and constituted abuse of the legal process, as both FIRs were filed on the same date regarding the same incident, making continued prosecution contrary to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1026/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed both cross-FIRs (Crime Nos. 53/2026 and 54/2026) registered between estranged spouses, finding that the allegations were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific attribution of roles to the accused. The court held that the criminal proceedings arose from matrimonial discord and constituted abuse of the legal process, as both FIRs were filed on the same date regarding the same incident, making continued prosecution contrary to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case