RAHUL KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3435/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135602026

Filing Number

MCRC/5726/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3435/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR

    Adv. DEVESH CHANDRA VERMA,PRATEEK SINGH THAKUR,PRATEEK SINGH THAKUR, ,PRATEEK SINGH THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/3435/2026 Rahul Kumar sought regular bail in a cybercrime-related extortion case involving an alleged Rs. 28 lakh fraud. The applicant was arrested for offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (cheating, criminal intimidation) and Information Technology Act after a complainant was threatened via WhatsApp into transferring funds to fraudulent accounts. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail on grounds of parity, as four co-accused had already been released on bail, alongside the applicant's prolonged detention and the likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings. Bail was conditioned on personal bond with sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory court appearance on trial dates and no adjournment requests during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/3435/2026 Rahul Kumar sought regular bail in a cybercrime-related extortion case involving an alleged Rs. 28 lakh fraud. The applicant was arrested for offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (cheating, criminal intimidation) and Information Technology Act after a complainant was threatened via WhatsApp into transferring funds to fraudulent accounts. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail on grounds of parity, as four co-accused had already been released on bail, alongside the applicant's prolonged detention and the likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings. Bail was conditioned on personal bond with sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory court appearance on trial dates and no adjournment requests during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case