ANIL THARVANI vs SMT. KALPANA @ MUKTI — CRR/502/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135552026

Filing Number

CRR/5724/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/502/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL THARVANI

    Adv. Deblina Maity,AKHTAR HUSSAIN,AKHTAR HUSSAIN, ,MOHAMMED WAQUAR RIZVI,REENA SINGH,Ramsajiwan,AKHTAR HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KALPANA @ MUKTI

  2. 2.Ku. Tanishka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR No. 502/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Anil Tharvani's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order. The Family Court had awarded Rs. 2,500/month to his wife (Kalpana) and Rs. 500/month to his minor daughter under Section 125 Cr.P.C., finding the wife justified in living separately due to cruelty, lacking independent income, while the husband earned Rs. 1.5-2 lakh monthly. The High Court upheld the award, rejecting arguments that the wife was educated and capable of self-maintenance, and found no illegality or jurisdictional error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/502/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR No. 502/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Anil Tharvani's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order. The Family Court had awarded Rs. 2,500/month to his wife (Kalpana) and Rs. 500/month to his minor daughter under Section 125 Cr.P.C., finding the wife justified in living separately due to cruelty, lacking independent income, while the husband earned Rs. 1.5-2 lakh monthly. The High Court upheld the award, rejecting arguments that the wife was educated and capable of self-maintenance, and found no illegality or jurisdictional error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case