Biranchi Toppo S/o Late Fundra Toppo (Dead) Through LRS(Legal Heir) vs DHARAM SINGH THAKUR — WP227/547/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135442026

Filing Number

WP227/7828/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP227/547/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Biranchi Toppo S/o Late Fundra Toppo (Dead) Through LRS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Satish Kumar Tripathi,Jitendra Shukla,Jitendra Shukla, ,Jitendra Shukla1.

  2. 2.Mrs. Tiharo Toppo1.

  3. 3.Ku. Kavita Toppo1.

  4. 4.Manish Kumar Toppo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARAM SINGH THAKUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP227/547/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Biranchi Toppo challenging an ongoing execution proceeding. The court held that under Section 50 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a decree can be executed against the legal representatives of a deceased judgment-debtor, and the petitioners' objections lacked merit since the compromise decree dated 14.05.2016 remained valid and final after the original defendant's challenge was rejected in 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP227/547/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Biranchi Toppo challenging an ongoing execution proceeding. The court held that under Section 50 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a decree can be executed against the legal representatives of a deceased judgment-debtor, and the petitioners' objections lacked merit since the compromise decree dated 14.05.2016 remained valid and final after the original defendant's challenge was rejected in 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case