HEMLAL YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPCR/194/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135432026

Filing Number

WPCR/7827/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPCR/194/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMLAL YADAV

    Adv. RAJNI SOREN,Pritam Singh,Pritam Singh, ,Ishwari Ghritlahare,Ishwari Ghritlahare,Pritam Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Inspector General Of Prions,

  3. 3.Superintendent,

  4. 4.Collector and District Magistrate Raipur

  5. 5.Superintendent of Police,

  6. 6.Thana In Charge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Hemlal Yadav's petition seeking parole release, finding that authorities reasonably denied his request based on victim safety concerns. Although an initial police enquiry exonerated him of alleged threats made during his previous parole, the court upheld the competent authority's decision considering the serious nature of his culpable homicide conviction, subsequent apprehensions expressed by the victim and local residents, and paramount public safety considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCR/194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Hemlal Yadav's petition seeking parole release, finding that authorities reasonably denied his request based on victim safety concerns. Although an initial police enquiry exonerated him of alleged threats made during his previous parole, the court upheld the competent authority's decision considering the serious nature of his culpable homicide conviction, subsequent apprehensions expressed by the victim and local residents, and paramount public safety considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case