RAHUL TIWARI JAI PRAKASH SHUKLA, ,MANJUL PAL,Shiv SewaK Manjhi vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3100/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135292026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

MCRC/5709/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3100/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL TIWARI JAI PRAKASH SHUKLA, ,MANJUL PAL,Shiv SewaK Manjhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicants Ishan Singh Mandloi and Rahul Tiwari, arrested in connection with illegal possession of knives and motor vehicle violations under Arms Act Sections 25, 27 and Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Despite their prior criminal antecedents (3 and 4 respectively), the court considered their prolonged detention since February 26, 2026, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial to warrant bail, subject to stringent conditions including personal bond with sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicants Ishan Singh Mandloi and Rahul Tiwari, arrested in connection with illegal possession of knives and motor vehicle violations under Arms Act Sections 25, 27 and Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Despite their prior criminal antecedents (3 and 4 respectively), the court considered their prolonged detention since February 26, 2026, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial to warrant bail, subject to stringent conditions including personal bond with sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case