STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs MAMTA CHOUDHARY Advocate - AWADH TRIPATHI — WA/479/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010135262026

Filing Number

WA/7819/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

WA/479/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  2. 2.Deputy Secretary

  3. 3.Under Secretary

  4. 4.Director

  5. 5.Joint Director

  6. 6.Joint Director

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA CHOUDHARY Advocate - AWADH TRIPATHI

  2. 2.Chief Municipal Officer

    Adv. RAMKRISHNA KASHYAP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WA/479/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's writ appeal against a lower court order favoring Mamta Choudhary, rejecting the State's application to condone a 283-day delay in filing the appeal. The court found the State's explanation—attributing delay to bureaucratic procedures and multi-level governmental approvals—unsatisfactory and lacking cogent reasoning. Without demonstrating sufficient cause justifying delay condonation, the appeal was dismissed as a natural consequence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/479/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA/479/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's writ appeal against a lower court order favoring Mamta Choudhary, rejecting the State's application to condone a 283-day delay in filing the appeal. The court found the State's explanation—attributing delay to bureaucratic procedures and multi-level governmental approvals—unsatisfactory and lacking cogent reasoning. Without demonstrating sufficient cause justifying delay condonation, the appeal was dismissed as a natural consequence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case