STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs SANJAY KUMAR SAHU Advocate - C.R.Sahu — WA/466/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010135212026
Filing Number
WA/7818/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
WA/466/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
PUNISHMENT ( 624 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
2.The Director General Jail and Corrective Service
-
3.The Jail Superintendent
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAY KUMAR SAHU Advocate - C.R.Sahu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WA/466/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the State's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the writ appeal without examining merits. Key Reasoning: The State filed an appeal 86 days beyond the 45-day limitation period prescribed under the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. While the State cited routine administrative procedures (inter-departmental correspondence, legal opinions, file processing) as reasons for delay, the court held these do not constitute "sufficient cause." Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that government entities are bound by limitation laws equally as private litigants, and administrative bureaucracy cannot excuse inordinate delays. The court directed all states to streamline legal machinery and hold officials accountable for delays causing revenue loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/466/2026
Case Summary: WA/466/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the State's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the writ appeal without examining merits. Key Reasoning: The State filed an appeal 86 days beyond the 45-day limitation period prescribed under the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. While the State cited routine administrative procedures (inter-departmental correspondence, legal opinions, file processing) as reasons for delay, the court held these do not constitute "sufficient cause." Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that government entities are bound by limitation laws equally as private litigants, and administrative bureaucracy cannot excuse inordinate delays. The court directed all states to streamline legal machinery and hold officials accountable for delays causing revenue loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts