RAM JOSHI @ TOTWA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3256/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010134872026

Filing Number

MCRC/5685/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3256/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM JOSHI @ TOTWA

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,RITIKA VERMA,RITIKA VERMA, ,PURUSHOTTAM RAJAK,RITIKA VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Ram Joshi's bail application (filed under BNSS 2023) for charges under the Arms Act, finding that his mother had filed contradictory affidavits before the High Court and trial court. Though the trial court had granted bail on 09/04/2026, the court accepted the applicant's withdrawal of the High Court petition after the mother tendered an unconditional apology, attributing her conduct to legal ignorance as a widow. The court cautioned the deponent and lawyers against repeating such conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Ram Joshi's bail application (filed under BNSS 2023) for charges under the Arms Act, finding that his mother had filed contradictory affidavits before the High Court and trial court. Though the trial court had granted bail on 09/04/2026, the court accepted the applicant's withdrawal of the High Court petition after the mother tendered an unconditional apology, attributing her conduct to legal ignorance as a widow. The court cautioned the deponent and lawyers against repeating such conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case