Ajay Sonwani vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3282/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010134632026

Filing Number

MCRC/5676/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3282/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Sonwani

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ajay Sonwani, arrested for illegal liquor possession under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, considering he had only one prior Excise Act offense (pending trial), had been in custody since February 2, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court imposed strict conditions requiring his personal presence at trial dates, furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, and undertaking not to seek adjournments when witnesses are present, with violations subject to cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ajay Sonwani, arrested for illegal liquor possession under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, considering he had only one prior Excise Act offense (pending trial), had been in custody since February 2, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court imposed strict conditions requiring his personal presence at trial dates, furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, and undertaking not to seek adjournments when witnesses are present, with violations subject to cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case