G.P. TIWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3243/2021
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 13th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010134472021
Filing Number
WPS/7266/2021
Filing Date
07-Jun-2021
Registration No
WPS/3243/2021
Registration Date
26-Jun-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.P. TIWARI
Adv. K.P. Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Accountant General,
Adv. RAJ KUMAR GUPTA
-
3.The Block Education Officer,
-
4.The Senior Accounts Officer,
-
5.The Pension Adjudication Committee,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by G.P. Tiwari seeking recovery of Rs. 6,31,351/- from his General Provident Fund (GPF) balance, holding that the writ petition was not maintainable. The court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue a civil suit claiming the disputed amount with interest against the respondents instead of continuing with the writ petition remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
25-Oct-2021
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
10-Aug-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
06-Aug-2021
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
29-Jul-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
29-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3243/2021
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by G.P. Tiwari seeking recovery of Rs. 6,31,351/- from his General Provident Fund (GPF) balance, holding that the writ petition was not maintainable. The court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue a civil suit claiming the disputed amount with interest against the respondents instead of continuing with the writ petition remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts