RAJESH KUMAR KASHYAP vs STATE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - HARSHAL CHOUHAN, ,KESHAV DEWANGAN,AKASH PANDEY,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR — WPL/77/2025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010133862025
Filing Number
WPL/7487/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
WPL/77/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LABOUR MATTERS ( 1 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 112 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR KASHYAP
Adv. ABHISHEK SINGH,AMOD KUMAR SHRIVASTAV,AMOD KUMAR SHRIVASTAV, ,S.P.KALE,LAV SHARMA,AMOD KUMAR SHRIVASTAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - HARSHAL CHOUHAN, ,KESHAV DEWANGAN,AKASH PANDEY,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR
-
2.State Bank of India
-
3.State Bank of India
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Case Summary Rajesh Kumar Kashyap v. State Bank of India (WPL No. 77/2025) — High Court of Chhattisgarh The writ petition was admitted on 05.05.2025 with the court calling for records from the lower court. In the subsequent hearing on 15.04.2026, the respondent (State Bank of India) was granted two weeks' time to file its reply, with the matter posted for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPL/77/2025
Case Summary Rajesh Kumar Kashyap v. State Bank of India (WPL No. 77/2025) — High Court of Chhattisgarh The writ petition was admitted on 05.05.2025 with the court calling for records from the lower court. In the subsequent hearing on 15.04.2026, the respondent (State Bank of India) was granted two weeks' time to file its reply, with the matter posted for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts