NARAD KUMAR MANJHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3158/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010133652026
Filing Number
WPS/7705/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3158/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARAD KUMAR MANJHI
Adv. F.S.KHARE,YASHWANT MISHRA,YASHWANT MISHRA, ,MAMTA MAHILANGE,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,NILU KUMARI SINGH,YASHWANT MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
-
3.Collector Sukma
-
4.Chief Executive Officer
-
5.Sumit Kumar Dhruw
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without quashing the impugned orders, instead directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the state authorities regarding his posting as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Konta. The court noted that CEO transfers require state government permission per a circular dated 11.04.2025, and mandated the authorities to decide the representation within six weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3158/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without quashing the impugned orders, instead directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the state authorities regarding his posting as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Konta. The court noted that CEO transfers require state government permission per a circular dated 11.04.2025, and mandated the authorities to decide the representation within six weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts