M/S. GOYAL MATERIAL SUPPLIERS vs PRAHLAD DEWANGAN — FA/74/2024

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010133632024

Filing Number

FA/7834/2024

Filing Date

16-Apr-2024

Registration No

FA/74/2024

Registration Date

19-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR POSSESSION ( 1720 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GOYAL MATERIAL SUPPLIERS

    Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL,VIDHI AGRAWAL, ,Aditi Singhvi

  2. 2.Anand Kumar Agrawal

  3. 3.Amit Agrawal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAHLAD DEWANGAN

    Adv. SHAHID SIDDIQUI,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed both appeals filed by Goyal Material Suppliers against the trial court's judgment that had rejected their suit for vacant possession of 4 dismil of land and partly allowed the defendant's counter-claim for permanent injunction over the same land. The court held that since the defendant specifically denied the plaintiff's title over the disputed 15 dismil of land (4 dismil of which contained his house) and claimed his own title, the plaintiff's title was "in cloud" and required filing a separate suit for declaration of title first; without establishing title, the court could not grant possession. Additionally, the court rejected the plaintiff's application to introduce the original sale deed at the appellate stage, finding it amounted to negligence in not producing it during trial, and upheld the trial court's finding that the defendant remained in continuous possession of the 4 dismil plot since the 1994 sale deed execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  6. 23-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/74/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed both appeals filed by Goyal Material Suppliers against the trial court's judgment that had rejected their suit for vacant possession of 4 dismil of land and partly allowed the defendant's counter-claim for permanent injunction over the same land. The court held that since the defendant specifically denied the plaintiff's title over the disputed 15 dismil of land (4 dismil of which contained his house) and claimed his own title, the plaintiff's title was "in cloud" and required filing a separate suit for declaration of title first; without establishing title, the court could not grant possession. Additionally, the court rejected the plaintiff's application to introduce the original sale deed at the appellate stage, finding it amounted to negligence in not producing it during trial, and upheld the trial court's finding that the defendant remained in continuous possession of the 4 dismil plot since the 1994 sale deed execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case