M/S. GOYAL MATERIAL SUPPLIERS vs PRAHLAD DEWANGAN — FA/74/2024
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010133632024
Filing Number
FA/7834/2024
Filing Date
16-Apr-2024
Registration No
FA/74/2024
Registration Date
19-Apr-2024
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL FOR POSSESSION ( 1720 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. GOYAL MATERIAL SUPPLIERS
Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL,VIDHI AGRAWAL, ,Aditi Singhvi
-
2.Anand Kumar Agrawal
-
3.Amit Agrawal
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAHLAD DEWANGAN
Adv. SHAHID SIDDIQUI,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed both appeals filed by Goyal Material Suppliers against the trial court's judgment that had rejected their suit for vacant possession of 4 dismil of land and partly allowed the defendant's counter-claim for permanent injunction over the same land. The court held that since the defendant specifically denied the plaintiff's title over the disputed 15 dismil of land (4 dismil of which contained his house) and claimed his own title, the plaintiff's title was "in cloud" and required filing a separate suit for declaration of title first; without establishing title, the court could not grant possession. Additionally, the court rejected the plaintiff's application to introduce the original sale deed at the appellate stage, finding it amounted to negligence in not producing it during trial, and upheld the trial court's finding that the defendant remained in continuous possession of the 4 dismil plot since the 1994 sale deed execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
23-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
23-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. FA/74/2024
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed both appeals filed by Goyal Material Suppliers against the trial court's judgment that had rejected their suit for vacant possession of 4 dismil of land and partly allowed the defendant's counter-claim for permanent injunction over the same land. The court held that since the defendant specifically denied the plaintiff's title over the disputed 15 dismil of land (4 dismil of which contained his house) and claimed his own title, the plaintiff's title was "in cloud" and required filing a separate suit for declaration of title first; without establishing title, the court could not grant possession. Additionally, the court rejected the plaintiff's application to introduce the original sale deed at the appellate stage, finding it amounted to negligence in not producing it during trial, and upheld the trial court's finding that the defendant remained in continuous possession of the 4 dismil plot since the 1994 sale deed execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts