TAKESHVAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3217/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010133562026

Filing Number

WPS/7696/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3217/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAKESHVAR SAHU

    Adv. HIMANSHU PANDEY,RAJVANSH SINGH,RAJVANSH SINGH, ,RAJVANSH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Upper Secretary

  6. 6.Executive Engineer

  7. 7.Assistant Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's regularization claim within 4 months. Relying on recent Supreme Court judgments condemning prolonged contractual employment on sanctioned posts, the court permitted the petitioner—employed since 2012 on contractual basis—to submit a fresh representation for regularization, which the authorities must decide expeditiously in accordance with law and considering his service period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's regularization claim within 4 months. Relying on recent Supreme Court judgments condemning prolonged contractual employment on sanctioned posts, the court permitted the petitioner—employed since 2012 on contractual basis—to submit a fresh representation for regularization, which the authorities must decide expeditiously in accordance with law and considering his service period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case