SMT. CHANDRAKALA KHARE ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,MOHAMMAD NAQEEB vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3283/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010133542026

Filing Number

WPS/7694/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3283/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. CHANDRAKALA KHARE ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,MOHAMMAD NAQEEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director

  3. 3.The Commissioner

  4. 4.The Collector

  5. 5.District Education Officer

  6. 6.Block Education Officer

  7. 7.Block Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: WPS/3283/2026 Assistant Teacher Smt. Chandrakala Khare challenged a District Education Officer's order dated 04.06.2025 and sought relief in parity with another similar case. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that a representation had already been submitted and withdrew the merits-based challenge. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the District Education Officer to consider and decide the pending representation within 6 months, with both parties consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WPS/3283/2026 Assistant Teacher Smt. Chandrakala Khare challenged a District Education Officer's order dated 04.06.2025 and sought relief in parity with another similar case. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that a representation had already been submitted and withdrew the merits-based challenge. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the District Education Officer to consider and decide the pending representation within 6 months, with both parties consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case