GOPIRAM RAJWADE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/950/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010133472026
Filing Number
CRA/5660/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRA/950/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT, KIDNAPPING & ABDUCTION. ( 1404 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPIRAM RAJWADE
Adv. Jitendra Shukla,S M Shukla,S M Shukla, ,SHREYANSH TIWARI,SHREYANSH TIWARI,S M Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 950/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the appeal filed by Gopiram Rajwade against his conviction under Sections 75(2) and 78(2) of BNS with concurrent sentences of three years rigorous imprisonment. The Court granted the applicant's bail petition and suspended his substantive jail sentence pending final disposal of the appeal, subject to execution of a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/950/2026
Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 950/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the appeal filed by Gopiram Rajwade against his conviction under Sections 75(2) and 78(2) of BNS with concurrent sentences of three years rigorous imprisonment. The Court granted the applicant's bail petition and suspended his substantive jail sentence pending final disposal of the appeal, subject to execution of a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts