PAHRU MARKANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3452/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010133022026

Filing Number

MCRC/5632/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3452/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAHRU MARKANDEY

    Adv. Siddharth Pandey,MAHESH PANDEY,MAHESH PANDEY, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,MAHESH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3452/2026 Decision: Pahru Markandey's second bail application was rejected. The High Court of Chhattisgarh found that the serious nature of the allegations—stabbing a man three times in the abdomen causing life-threatening injuries—and the previous rejection of his first bail application justified continued detention. The court rejected his argument that witness hostility warranted bail, noting release could result in evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3452/2026 Decision: Pahru Markandey's second bail application was rejected. The High Court of Chhattisgarh found that the serious nature of the allegations—stabbing a man three times in the abdomen causing life-threatening injuries—and the previous rejection of his first bail application justified continued detention. The court rejected his argument that witness hostility warranted bail, noting release could result in evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case