SHANKAR BARETH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3380/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010132912026

Filing Number

MCRC/5622/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3380/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR BARETH

    Adv. ASHISH GUPTA,MANISH UPADHYAY,MANISH UPADHYAY, ,MINAKSHI GUPTA,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Shankar Bareth, who was arrested for offences under POCSO Act and other sections for allegedly molesting two minor girls on two separate occasions. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's history of prior criminal cases, and the ongoing trial, despite the applicant's arguments of false implication and prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3380/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Shankar Bareth, who was arrested for offences under POCSO Act and other sections for allegedly molesting two minor girls on two separate occasions. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's history of prior criminal cases, and the ongoing trial, despite the applicant's arguments of false implication and prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case