NISHA SOLOMON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3251/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010132632026

Filing Number

WPS/7653/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3251/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NISHA SOLOMON

    Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,SANDEEP SINGH,SANDEEP SINGH, ,RUPESH SAHU,VEDANT SHADANGI,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,waquar naiyer,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Union of India

    Adv. DSGI

  4. 4.Director

  5. 5.Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Vyapam)

    Adv. AVINASH SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to all respondents in a writ petition (WPS No. 3251 of 2026) filed by Nisha Solomon against the State of Chhattisgarh and Union of India regarding employment matters. The respondents were granted 4 weeks to file their reply. As interim relief, the Court directed that any appointment made hereafter shall be subject to the final outcome of this writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to all respondents in a writ petition (WPS No. 3251 of 2026) filed by Nisha Solomon against the State of Chhattisgarh and Union of India regarding employment matters. The respondents were granted 4 weeks to file their reply. As interim relief, the Court directed that any appointment made hereafter shall be subject to the final outcome of this writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case