MOHAMMAD SAJID KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1042/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010132622026
Filing Number
CRMP/5610/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1042/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD SAJID KHAN
Adv. SHIVAM AGRAWAL,Hemant Kumar Agrawal,Hemant Kumar Agrawal, ,SURBHI YADAV,SURBHI YADAV,SURBHI YADAV,Hemant Kumar Agrawal
-
2.Neamat Ratima
-
3.Gulam Mohammad
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Tanveer Begum
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash the FIR and instead directed the parties to attempt mediation. The petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 50,000 with the Court's Mediation Centre within two weeks for payment to the respondent wife. An interim stay on arrest was granted, conditional on full cooperation with investigation and deposit of the required amount. In the follow-up order dated 01.05.2026, after mediation failed, the case was listed for further hearing with notice to respondent No. 2, and interim protection was continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1042/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash the FIR and instead directed the parties to attempt mediation. The petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 50,000 with the Court's Mediation Centre within two weeks for payment to the respondent wife. An interim stay on arrest was granted, conditional on full cooperation with investigation and deposit of the required amount. In the follow-up order dated 01.05.2026, after mediation failed, the case was listed for further hearing with notice to respondent No. 2, and interim protection was continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts