SHEIKH FARUKH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3248/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010132112026

Filing Number

MCRC/5589/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3248/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEIKH FARUKH

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Sheikh Farukh, arrested for assault with a weapon causing simple injuries and related offenses. The court granted regular bail considering the minor nature of injuries, the charge-sheet already being filed, the applicant's explained criminal antecedents, and prolonged custody since November 2024. The release was conditioned on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Sheikh Farukh, arrested for assault with a weapon causing simple injuries and related offenses. The court granted regular bail considering the minor nature of injuries, the charge-sheet already being filed, the applicant's explained criminal antecedents, and prolonged custody since November 2024. The release was conditioned on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case