CHANDRAPRABHA KUMARI RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/450/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010131192026

Filing Number

MCC/7566/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCC/450/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION ( 1732 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAPRABHA KUMARI RATRE

    Adv. UDHO RAM KOSHALEY,PARAG RAJ JATWAR,PARAG RAJ JATWAR, ,GURU PRASAD KURRE,RAJESH PURENA,PARAG RAJ JATWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector

  3. 3.District Progam Officer

  4. 4.Project Officer

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Chandraprabha Kumari Ratre's Miscellaneous Case to restore her Writ Petition No. 2650 of 2023, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.11.2025. The court found merit in the reasons stated in the application and restored the writ petition for hearing and disposal according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Chandraprabha Kumari Ratre's Miscellaneous Case to restore her Writ Petition No. 2650 of 2023, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.11.2025. The court found merit in the reasons stated in the application and restored the writ petition for hearing and disposal according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case