POONAMCHAND VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SEEMA VERMA — MCRC/3288/2026

Disposed: --REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010130872026

Filing Number

MCRC/5539/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3288/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--REJECTED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAMCHAND VERMA

    Adv. Amit Kumar Verma,KESHAV DEWANGAN,KESHAV DEWANGAN, ,KESHAV DEWANGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SEEMA VERMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected bail applications by Kallu Mansuri and Poonamchandra Verma, who were accused of orchestrating a cyber fraud scheme involving a fake forex trading platform. The court found prima facie evidence establishing their involvement in the transaction chain, as Rs. 50,000 from the victim's Rs. 46 lakh investment was traced to an account allegedly provided by the applicants to co-accused persons. The court determined that the serious nature of organized cyber fraud allegations and the applicants' demonstrated role in facilitating fraudulent transactions made them unsuitable for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected bail applications by Kallu Mansuri and Poonamchandra Verma, who were accused of orchestrating a cyber fraud scheme involving a fake forex trading platform. The court found prima facie evidence establishing their involvement in the transaction chain, as Rs. 50,000 from the victim's Rs. 46 lakh investment was traced to an account allegedly provided by the applicants to co-accused persons. The court determined that the serious nature of organized cyber fraud allegations and the applicants' demonstrated role in facilitating fraudulent transactions made them unsuitable for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case