SEVANT LAL SAHU (KASHYAP) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1062/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010130612026
Filing Number
CRMP/5515/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1062/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SEVANT LAL SAHU (KASHYAP)
Adv. RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR, ,KIRTILAL,LEEKESH KUMAR,AVISHEK BHARTI,VAIBHAV MITTAL,RENU KOCHAR,SANTOSH KUMAR GAUTAM,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Lallti Kumar Devangan
-
3.XYZ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed petitioner Sevant Lal Sahu's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under IPC Sections 452, 354, 294, 506(B), and 323, finding prima facie material supports the charges despite the complainant's initial withdrawal. The court held that cognizable, non-compoundable offences cannot be extinguished merely by complainant withdrawal, and disputed factual issues regarding political rivalry, document suppression, and allegations require trial examination, not summary quashment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1062/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed petitioner Sevant Lal Sahu's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under IPC Sections 452, 354, 294, 506(B), and 323, finding prima facie material supports the charges despite the complainant's initial withdrawal. The court held that cognizable, non-compoundable offences cannot be extinguished merely by complainant withdrawal, and disputed factual issues regarding political rivalry, document suppression, and allegations require trial examination, not summary quashment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts