OMPRAKASH@OM vs STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3221/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010130432026

Filing Number

MCRC/5511/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3221/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OMPRAKASH@OM

    Adv. PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA,Pushkar Sinha,Pushkar Sinha, ,TAHIL KHANNA,SAPNOMOY CHATTOPADHYAY,Pushkar Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3221/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Omprakash@Om, arrested for theft of ration (rice and gram valued at Rs. 48,500) from a Fair Price Shop. The court found the applicant entitled to bail on grounds of parity, as a co-accused (Indrapal Sahu) had already been granted bail by the same court. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements at trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3221/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3221/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Omprakash@Om, arrested for theft of ration (rice and gram valued at Rs. 48,500) from a Fair Price Shop. The court found the applicant entitled to bail on grounds of parity, as a co-accused (Indrapal Sahu) had already been granted bail by the same court. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements at trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case