PUSHPKANT vs UDDHAV KHAMHARI — WA/424/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010129872026
Filing Number
WA/7491/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WA/424/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES: 2601 TO 2604 ( 26 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS. ( 2604 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUSHPKANT
Adv. AMIT KUMAR,Anil Kumar,Anil Kumar, ,SOURABH SONWANI,Anushree Mishra,Anil Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.UDDHAV KHAMHARI
Adv. ,MOHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN,Sareena Khan,Sareena Khan 1123
-
2.Smt. Takshasheela
-
3.Smt. Padmini
-
4.Dhaniram
-
5.Smt. Kumudani
-
6.Smt. Champilata
-
7.Pavitra Bai(Legal Heir)7.
-
8.(i) Ghanshyam Pradhan7.
-
9.(ii) Khitipati7.
-
10.(iii) Sudeshta7.
-
11.(iv) Smt. Supragya
-
12.Kunwarmati(Legal Heir)8.
-
13.(A) Meena Barik
-
14.Smt. Malti
-
15.Smt. Janki Bai(Legal Heir)10.
-
16.(i) Vishvamitra Vishal10.
-
17.(ii) Raj Kumar Vishal10.
-
18.(iii) Ashwani Vishal10.
-
19.(iv) Subhashani
-
20.Smt. Gurbari Bai(Legal Heir)11.
-
21.(i) Rajesh11.
-
22.(ii) Khemlal Sahu11.
-
23.(iii) Smt. Vidhyawati11.
-
24.(iv) Rajkumari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WA/424/2026 Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur Date: 15.06.2026 Decision: The High Court dismissed Pushpkant's writ appeal, upholding the Single Judge's order that relegated the dispute to execution proceedings under Section 47 of the CPC. The court held that Pushpkant's challenge to the inclusion of Khasra No. 203 (1.530 hectares) in the revenue record mutation concerns execution and implementation of a 1999 civil decree, which must be adjudicated by the Executing Court rather than through writ jurisdiction. The appellant retains liberty to raise all objections before the Executing Court and pursue remedies under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/424/2026
Case Summary: WA/424/2026 Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur Date: 15.06.2026 Decision: The High Court dismissed Pushpkant's writ appeal, upholding the Single Judge's order that relegated the dispute to execution proceedings under Section 47 of the CPC. The court held that Pushpkant's challenge to the inclusion of Khasra No. 203 (1.530 hectares) in the revenue record mutation concerns execution and implementation of a 1999 civil decree, which must be adjudicated by the Executing Court rather than through writ jurisdiction. The appellant retains liberty to raise all objections before the Executing Court and pursue remedies under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts