ABHISHEK JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3251/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010129822026

Filing Number

MCRC/5494/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3251/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK JAISWAL

    Adv. SHIVENDU PANDYA,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK, ,POOJA YADAV,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Abhishek Jaiswal in a cyber fraud case involving mule bank accounts used for laundering proceeds of cyber crimes (Rs. 8,22,146). The court found him entitled to bail based on parity with a similarly placed co-accused granted bail by the Supreme Court, his prolonged judicial custody since April 2025, completed investigation, and acquittal in a related case, subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Abhishek Jaiswal in a cyber fraud case involving mule bank accounts used for laundering proceeds of cyber crimes (Rs. 8,22,146). The court found him entitled to bail based on parity with a similarly placed co-accused granted bail by the Supreme Court, his prolonged judicial custody since April 2025, completed investigation, and acquittal in a related case, subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case