Rameshwar Yadav vs District Judge Raipur Advocate - A.G., ,ANUBHUTI MARHAS,ANUBHUTI MARHAS,RANBIR SINGH MARHAS — WPS/2310/2020

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010129362020

Filing Number

WPS/6615/2020

Filing Date

10-Jun-2020

Registration No

WPS/2310/2020

Registration Date

11-Jun-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rameshwar Yadav

    Adv. Tarendra Kumar Jha,Bidya Nand Mishra,Bidya Nand Mishra, ,Bhaskar Jha,Narayan Prasad Thakur,Arati Chanda Dutta,Bidya Nand Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.District Judge Raipur Advocate - A.G., ,ANUBHUTI MARHAS,ANUBHUTI MARHAS,RANBIR SINGH MARHAS

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.High Court of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh partially allowed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of Rameshwar Yadav, a court peon, for unauthorized absence. The court set aside the dismissal order because the disciplinary authority considered the employee's past conduct without disclosing it in the show-cause notice, violating natural justice principles and government circulars. The matter was remitted to the disciplinary authority to reconsider punishment afresh, providing copies of past records and proper hearing opportunity to the petitioner within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  11. 22-Feb-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  18. 08-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  19. 27-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  20. 22-Nov-2023

    Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  21. 24-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  22. 19-Jun-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  23. 19-Jun-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 10-Jun-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2310/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh partially allowed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of Rameshwar Yadav, a court peon, for unauthorized absence. The court set aside the dismissal order because the disciplinary authority considered the employee's past conduct without disclosing it in the show-cause notice, violating natural justice principles and government circulars. The matter was remitted to the disciplinary authority to reconsider punishment afresh, providing copies of past records and proper hearing opportunity to the petitioner within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case