GOLU ALIAS NIRAJ KUMAR RANGLANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/529/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010128662026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5452/2026

Filing Date

28-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/529/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOLU ALIAS NIRAJ KUMAR RANGLANI

    Adv. Priyanshu Gupta,OM KUKREJA,OM KUKREJA, ,NITESH SAHU,OM KUKREJA,OM KUKREJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the anticipatory bail application of Golu @ Neeraj Kumar Ranglani, who was accused of running an online gambling platform (Ganpati Book) under Sections 7-8 of the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022. The court found sufficient evidence of his involvement based on co-accused Arun Kumar Yadav's statement, witness testimonies, mobile phone screenshots, and the rejection of bail for another co-accused, determining that the applicant's claim of medical grounds for his elderly parents was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/529/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the anticipatory bail application of Golu @ Neeraj Kumar Ranglani, who was accused of running an online gambling platform (Ganpati Book) under Sections 7-8 of the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022. The court found sufficient evidence of his involvement based on co-accused Arun Kumar Yadav's statement, witness testimonies, mobile phone screenshots, and the rejection of bail for another co-accused, determining that the applicant's claim of medical grounds for his elderly parents was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case