SMT. UMA AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/639/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010128542026
Filing Number
MCRCA/5445/2026
Filing Date
28-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/639/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. UMA AGRAWAL
Adv. Jaydeep Singh Yadav,VIJAY KUMAR SAHU,VIJAY KUMAR SAHU, ,VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
-
2.Smt. Rama Agrawal
-
3.Smt. Kanta Agrawal
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to three women (Uma, Rama, and Kanta Agrawal) accused of embezzlement in a 2009 bank loan fraud case involving Rs. 24 crores. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the loan's full repayment, 15+ years without arrest, cooperation with investigation, and applicants' serious medical conditions, though the case involves grave economic offence charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
28-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/639/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to three women (Uma, Rama, and Kanta Agrawal) accused of embezzlement in a 2009 bank loan fraud case involving Rs. 24 crores. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the loan's full repayment, 15+ years without arrest, cooperation with investigation, and applicants' serious medical conditions, though the case involves grave economic offence charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts