JAKMANIA BAI vs SANTLAL Advocate - A.G. — SA/282/2019

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010128092019

Filing Number

SA/7387/2019

Filing Date

08-Apr-2019

Registration No

SA/282/2019

Registration Date

10-Apr-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR INJUNCTION ( 1715 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAKMANIA BAI

    Adv. PRIYANKA MEHTA

  2. 2.Manmet Bai

  3. 3.Ishwar Prasad

  4. 4.Saroj

  5. 5.Krishna Kumar

  6. 6.Shiv Shankar Prasad

  7. 7.Chandra Rekha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTLAL Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Rameshwar

  3. 3.Lawango

  4. 4.Kaleshwari Bai

  5. 5.Bharat

  6. 6.Brijesh

  7. 7.Kamla

  8. 8.Sukhdev

  9. 9.Harisharan

  10. 10.Subhash

  11. 11.Basanti

  12. 12.Sumitra

  13. 13.Lalo

  14. 14.Kunwar Sai

  15. 15.Akchhay Kumar

  16. 16.Nanki

  17. 17.Kalawati

  18. 18.Leelavati

  19. 19.Maniyaro

  20. 20.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary of SA No. 282/2019 (High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur) The case of Jakmania Bai versus Santlal was called for hearing on 06/05/2026. The appellants' counsel requested adjournment, stating she did not have the case record and needed time to prepare arguments on admission. The court granted the adjournment request and adjourned the case to be listed after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  4. 22-Apr-2019

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  5. 08-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/282/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SA No. 282/2019 (High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur) The case of Jakmania Bai versus Santlal was called for hearing on 06/05/2026. The appellants' counsel requested adjournment, stating she did not have the case record and needed time to prepare arguments on admission. The court granted the adjournment request and adjourned the case to be listed after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case