RAJENDRA TANDON ALIAS RINKU TANDON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3364/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010127772026

Filing Number

MCRC/5410/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3364/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA TANDON ALIAS RINKU TANDON

    Adv. ARVIND SINHA,NEELAM SINHA,NEELAM SINHA, ,NEHA SINHA,SWEKSHA SHARMA,SWEKSHA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Rajendra Tandon, who was charged with rape (Section 64(1) BNS), criminal intimidation, and criminal force-related offences. The court found credible evidence of an illicit relationship and a joint property dispute, concluding the victim filed the FIR to harass the applicant after he refused to transfer the property to her exclusively, supported by his prior complaint lodged on 11.02.2026. The applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions, including mandatory personal attendance on specified court dates and restrictions on adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3364/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Rajendra Tandon, who was charged with rape (Section 64(1) BNS), criminal intimidation, and criminal force-related offences. The court found credible evidence of an illicit relationship and a joint property dispute, concluding the victim filed the FIR to harass the applicant after he refused to transfer the property to her exclusively, supported by his prior complaint lodged on 11.02.2026. The applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions, including mandatory personal attendance on specified court dates and restrictions on adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case