SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/355/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010127552026
Filing Number
MCC/7355/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCC/355/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION ( 1732 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH KUMAR
Adv. RISHI RAHUL SONI,VIKRANT PILLAY,VIKRANT PILLAY, ,ANANYA CHATTERJEE,Laxmeen Kashyap,VIKRANT PILLAY
-
2.Gopal Prasad Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
-
3.Joint Director
-
4.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission
-
5.Controller of Examination
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the Miscellaneous Case (MCC) and restored Writ Petition No. 2153/2023, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 07.11.2025, to its original number for hearing and disposal. The court accepted the applicants' reasons for restoration and directed the petition to proceed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCC/355/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the Miscellaneous Case (MCC) and restored Writ Petition No. 2153/2023, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 07.11.2025, to its original number for hearing and disposal. The court accepted the applicants' reasons for restoration and directed the petition to proceed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts