KANWAR SHRI BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, vs SMT. ASHA BAI JAIN — MA/61/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010127442026

Filing Number

MA/7345/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MA/61/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 43 RULE 1 C.P.C. ( 1727 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANWAR SHRI BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,

    Adv. B.P.SINGH, ,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh,VIDYA BHUSHAN SONI,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA,ADITYA SRIVASTAV,HARSVARDHAN S THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ASHA BAI JAIN

    Adv. ,AMARTYA BAJPAI,VARUN VATS SHARMA,VIKAS KUMAR SONI,ASHISH MITTAL,Mehal Jethani 1123

  2. 2.Smt. Versha Parekh

  3. 3.Smt. Nisha Jain

  4. 4.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  5. 5.Tehsildar Durg,

  6. 6.Office of Revenue Inspector Kasaridih

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the trial court's temporary injunction order restraining demarcation proceedings on disputed land, but granted the appellant liberty to file an application under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for judicial demarcation. The court held that proper demarcation through a court-appointed commissioner is necessary to effectively adjudicate the boundary dispute rather than relying on temporary injunction alone, and the trial court must decide the demarcation application independently on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MA/61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the trial court's temporary injunction order restraining demarcation proceedings on disputed land, but granted the appellant liberty to file an application under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for judicial demarcation. The court held that proper demarcation through a court-appointed commissioner is necessary to effectively adjudicate the boundary dispute rather than relying on temporary injunction alone, and the trial court must decide the demarcation application independently on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case