MUKUND KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3259/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010127242026

Filing Number

MCRC/5389/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3259/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKUND KASHYAP

    Adv. KISHORE NARAYAN,Pritam Singh,Pritam Singh, ,SAURABH PANDEY,GAGAN PANDEY,AMARNATH PANDEY,Pritam Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Mukund Kashyap, arrested for illegally transporting 102.42 bulk liters of foreign liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, considering the lengthy trial duration and his criminal antecedent from 2024. The court imposed stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearance on critical dates, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and directed expeditious trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Mukund Kashyap, arrested for illegally transporting 102.42 bulk liters of foreign liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, considering the lengthy trial duration and his criminal antecedent from 2024. The court imposed stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearance on critical dates, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and directed expeditious trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case