SHIVNARAYAN MARKAM vs SUKHBAI JANGDE — MCC/352/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010127112026

Filing Number

MCC/7326/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCC/352/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION ( 1732 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVNARAYAN MARKAM

    Adv. VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA,KALESHWAR PRASAD YADAV,KALESHWAR PRASAD YADAV, ,KALESHWAR PRASAD YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHBAI JANGDE

  2. 2.Jyoti Jangde

  3. 3.Raj Jangde

  4. 4.Chand Kumar Jangde

  5. 5.Amma Bai Jangde

  6. 6.Shobharam Jangde

  7. 7.Manoj Kumar Shyam

  8. 8.Makhan Singh Markam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application to restore MAC No. 898 of 2024, which had been dismissed due to non-compliance with registry directions within the stipulated time. The court condoned the delay of 307 days and restored the appeal to its original number, accepting the applicant's counsel's submission regarding inadvertence in meeting the deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/352/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application to restore MAC No. 898 of 2024, which had been dismissed due to non-compliance with registry directions within the stipulated time. The court condoned the delay of 307 days and restored the appeal to its original number, accepting the applicant's counsel's submission regarding inadvertence in meeting the deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case