ASHISH NIRMALKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3161/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010126352026

Filing Number

MCRC/5357/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3161/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH NIRMALKAR

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ashish Nirmalkar and Arman Ahmad in an NDPS case (Section 21(B) NDPS Act) involving 90.1 grams of Nitrazepam tablets seized from their possession. The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, the chargesheet had been filed, and the applicants had been in custody since January 8, 2026 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ashish Nirmalkar and Arman Ahmad in an NDPS case (Section 21(B) NDPS Act) involving 90.1 grams of Nitrazepam tablets seized from their possession. The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, the chargesheet had been filed, and the applicants had been in custody since January 8, 2026 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case