SMT. FULESHWARI PATEL vs RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL — CRR/485/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010126112026

Filing Number

CRR/5351/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/485/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. FULESHWARI PATEL

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA,Manisha Yadav,Manisha Yadav, ,DIVYANSH SHUKLA,Manisha Yadav,Manisha Yadav

  2. 2.Ku. Twinkle

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a criminal revision petition by a wife and minor daughter seeking enhanced monthly maintenance from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 5,000. The court upheld the Family Court's decision to enhance maintenance to Rs. 2,500 per month (from Rs. 1,500), finding no illegality in recognizing material change of circumstances due to 10+ years' passage and inflation since the original 2014 order. The court held the enhancement was just and proper given the husband's legal and moral obligation to maintain his wife and daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/485/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a criminal revision petition by a wife and minor daughter seeking enhanced monthly maintenance from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 5,000. The court upheld the Family Court's decision to enhance maintenance to Rs. 2,500 per month (from Rs. 1,500), finding no illegality in recognizing material change of circumstances due to 10+ years' passage and inflation since the original 2014 order. The court held the enhancement was just and proper given the husband's legal and moral obligation to maintain his wife and daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case